Global Whale Shark Program

St. Helena Whale Shark Project

The whale sharks that aggregate around this remote island are mainly adults, with males and females in roughly equal numbers. Two eyewitness accounts from local observers were the first reported sightings of whale sharks mating.

Key Partners & MMF Funders

St. Helena, a remote volcanic island in the central South Atlantic, hosts one of the few known whale shark (Rhincodon typus) aggregations made up mainly of adults. Males and females occur in roughly equal numbers. Georgia Aquarium (opens in a new tab) led four research expeditions to the island between 2015 and 2019, working with the St. Helena Government and the Saint Helena National Trust. MMF took part in the fieldwork.

St. Helena lies about 2,000 km (1,200 miles) west of Angola and 3,500 km (2,200 miles) east of Brazil. Steep cliffs surround the island, and the seabed drops sharply on every side to the abyssal plain (the deep ocean floor) at about 4,200–4,500 m (13,800–14,800 ft).

The St. Helena Government has maintained a whale shark sightings database since 1999, with reports from fishers, boaters, tourism operators, and members of the public. Locally, whale sharks are known as bone sharks. The expeditions combined photo-identification with satellite and acoustic tracking. Cameron Perry of the Georgia Institute of Technology led the resulting study, co-authored by MMF and published in Frontiers in Marine Science in 2020 (opens in a new tab).

What the project has done

  • Compiled 985 whale shark sightings reported to the St. Helena Government between 1999 and 2019, which show a clear season from November to May.
  • Photo-identified 277 individual whale sharks from 462 encounters between 2013 and 2019, adding them to the global Wildbook for Whale Sharks database.
  • Fitted 50 satellite tags to whale sharks between 2015 and 2019, 30 of which reported reliable data.
  • Installed acoustic receivers around the island from 2016 and fitted 43 sharks with acoustic transmitters, whose signals the receivers logged whenever a tagged shark swam within range, showing where the sharks spent their time.
  • Published evidence that St. Helena is an important reproductive habitat for whale sharks, in 2020 (opens in a new tab).
277whale sharks photo-identified at St. Helena, 2013–2019
1.1 : 1males to females, an unusually even sex ratio
~102sharks estimated to be present at any one time
3,395 kmfrom St. Helena to waters off Brazil, reached by one tagged female (2,110 miles)
A diver holds an underwater ultrasound probe against the belly of a whale shark in open blue water
Underwater ultrasound on a free-swimming whale shark at St. Helena.

Support our whale shark research

This study is complete. Gifts made here go to MMF's Global Whale Shark Program, which supports our whale shark research.

DonateSecure checkout on Donorbox · one-time or monthly

You can also donate stock or cryptocurrency, recommend a grant from your donor-advised fund, or leave a gift in your will.

What the study found

An aggregation of adults

Photo-identification, based on each shark’s unique spot pattern, recorded 277 individual whale sharks at St. Helena between April 2013 and May 2019. Of the 257 whose sex could be determined, 53% were male and 47% female, close to an even ratio. That makes the aggregation unusual in two respects: most known whale shark aggregations are dominated by young sharks, and most are dominated by males, at ratios from 3:1 to 10:1 or more.

The sharks were estimated at 5 to 12 m (16 to 39 ft) long, averaging 8.1 m (27 ft). Of the 108 males whose claspers (the paired male reproductive organs) were assessed, 86% were mature. About half of the females assessed were judged to be mature, using a conservative threshold of 9 m (30 ft) and excluding sharks in the uncertain 8–9 m (26–30 ft) range. Visual estimates tend to underestimate the length of large sharks, however, and laser measurements of 15 sharks in 2016 suggested that the sharks may, on average, be larger than they appear.

Between one and 40 whale sharks were seen around the island on any given day, with more than 30 feeding together on a few occasions. During one such event in January 2015, plankton samples contained large numbers of fish eggs, associated with nearby schools of skipjack tuna that were thought to be spawning at the surface. At most other times, however, the sharks showed no obvious feeding behavior and swam calmly 1 to 5 m (3 to 16 ft) below the surface.

Evidence of mating

Two eyewitness accounts of whale sharks mating were reported to the St. Helena Government, in January 2005 and February 2007. The first came from the island’s chief fisheries officer at the time, and the second from a professional fisher. Both events took place about 16 km (10 miles) offshore, at opposite ends of the island, and neither observer knew of the other’s report. Neither event was photographed, but the authors judged both witnesses credible and described their accounts as the first reported observations of whale sharks mating.

During the 2019 expedition, the team photographed a male following a female and touching her tail fin with his snout, which may be courtship behavior. They also photographed a female with abrasions on her pectoral fin that may indicate a recent mating attempt.

These observations, the presence of mature sharks of both sexes, and the roughly even overall sex ratio led the authors to conclude that St. Helena is most likely a mating ground for whale sharks, and the only one documented at the time. They recommended confirming this with blood hormone analysis or underwater ultrasound, methods that can assess a female’s reproductive state without capturing her. Researchers from Japan’s Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium have also performed underwater ultrasound and collected blood samples from free-swimming whale sharks at St. Helena.

Residency and the season

Whale sharks begin to arrive around St. Helena in November and December, with the aggregation peaking in January and declining by May. January to March accounted for 85.5% of all encounters in the sightings database.

A lagged identification rate model, which estimates the probability of seeing the same shark again after a given interval, put the number of sharks present at any one time at about 102, each remaining for an average of 19 days. The probability of resighting a shark fell to zero after about 75 days. The abundance estimate was considerably higher than at coastal sites in the Indo-Pacific analyzed the same way, including Mafia Island in Tanzania (35 sharks). It was similar, however, to the 116 sharks estimated offshore in Qatar.

Most sharks were transient: 65% were photographed only once. However, 34 sharks were identified in more than one season, and three acoustically tagged sharks returned to St. Helena at the start of a new season. Acoustic receivers detected sharks around the whole island, with activity concentrated on its calmer, northwest-facing leeward side. Two receivers there, at Barn Cap and the wreck of the Darkdale, recorded most of the detections.

Deep dives and long journeys

Most tagged sharks with reliable data (21 of 30) remained near St. Helena while their tags transmitted, but five traveled straight-line distances exceeding 1,000 km (620 miles). One female reached waters near Fernando de Noronha, off northeastern Brazil, 3,395 km (2,110 miles) from where she was tagged. Another shark traveled 1,054 km (655 miles) east toward Namibia and Angola. A third reached the Gulf of Guinea off Nigeria, more than 2,500 km (1,550 miles) away, while three moved toward Ascension Island.

Deep dives limited what the team could learn about the sharks’ movements away from St. Helena. While near the island, tagged sharks dived almost every day to around 600 m (2,000 ft) during daylight hours. After leaving, they dived less often but far deeper, with a maximum recorded depth of 1,879 m (6,165 ft). These dives triggered the tags’ safety release, which detaches a tag before water pressure can crush it; 14 tags released early. The authors concluded that the sharks’ deep-diving ability exceeded the capacity of the tracking technology available to them.

Protection and shipping

By 2016, new environmental regulations fully protected whale sharks (opens in a new tab) in the waters around St. Helena. The island was also included in two global studies of collision risk between whale sharks and large ships, both co-authored by MMF scientists. The first, published in 2022 (opens in a new tab), used satellite tracks from around the world and identified St. Helena as one of the Atlantic’s hotspots of whale shark space use.

The second, a 2024 study (opens in a new tab), gave St. Helena’s surrounding waters the lowest danger rank, a measure based on the relative number of large ships passing within 100 km (62 miles) of the sharks’ core habitat. Within that core habitat, the small area where the sharks concentrate, local vessel traffic was the greater concern, and passenger vessels posed the main collision risk. As a result, measures to reduce ship strikes in that small area would likely benefit whale sharks across the wider region.

MMF Project Team

Partners & MMF Supporters

Research papers

All MMF publications →

More whale shark projects

Our work is made possible by MMF’s core supporters

Join them as a core supporter